Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Thought of the day by Stoic philosopher Epictetus: “It is not what happens to you, but how you react to it, that matters”

Must Read

The numbers do not care how hard you work. Roughly 22.1 percent of new private-sector businesses fail within their first year. By the five-year mark that climbs to about 48.6 percent, and stretched to a decade roughly 65.3 percent are gone. In the most recent data, new businesses were closing within their first year at a rate of roughly 600 a day.

You cannot argue with a baseline like that, and you cannot control most of what sits behind it. The economy, the timing, the competitor with deeper pockets, the month the market simply is not there for what you built — none of it answers to you. 

The one thing that does answer to you is how you behave in front of it. That, I have come to think, is the only place worth spending your energy, precisely because it is the only place your energy actually reaches.

It is the idea usually hung on Epictetus, the Stoic who was born into slavery and later taught in exile: “it is not what happens to you, but how you react to it, that matters”. That exact sentence is a modern paraphrase — it reflects his thinking, but it is not something he is recorded as saying word for word.

I am not a psychologist or a therapist, and this is reading and reflection, not advice. The figures here are broad patterns from particular datasets, not rules about how any one business or founder will fare, and Stoicism is one philosophical view among many rather than a proven method.

Perhaps, the closest documented version comes from the Enchiridion, the short handbook of Epictetus written down by his pupil Arrian. In Elizabeth Carter’s translation it reads: “Men are disturbed, not by things, but by the principles and notions which they form concerning things.” Drier than the popular rewrite, but the claim is the same, and it is the claim that matters most for anyone running something: the event lands, and then you decide what to do with it.

The first part is not yours to command. The second part is entirely yours.

For a founder this matters. The dead market, the launch that flops, the month the cash runs out for an unexpected unforeseeable reason — these are the things, and most of them arrive uninvited. What you decide they mean, and what you do, is often the only variable you were ever holding.

The comeback stories worth repeating all turn on that same hinge. James Dyson is the one I keep coming back to, because the numbers are almost absurd. He built 5,126 failed prototypes before landing on a bagless vacuum that worked. He could not control whether a given prototype failed — the physics decided that. What he controlled was whether he built the next one. As he put it: “There are countless times an inventor can give up on an idea. By the time I made my 15th prototype, my third child was born.” Five thousand failures were the things. Building number 5,127 was the response.

Steve Jobs shows the same move under different pressure. He was pushed out of Apple in 1985 and only returned in 1997, when the company bought his other firm, NeXT. Being forced out was not something he controlled. What he controlled was the posture he took towards his own mistakes. As he said: “Sometimes when you innovate, you make mistakes. It is best to admit them quickly, and get on with improving your other innovations.” Admitting fast is a behaviour. It is available to anyone, in any month, regardless of how the quarter went.

Arianna Huffington reached the same place from another direction. Her second book was rejected by 36 publishers before one took it, and she later framed it this way: “Failure is not the opposite of success, it’s part of success.” Thirty-six rejections were not hers to prevent. Sending the manuscript out a thirty-seventh time was.

Perseverance clearly runs through these stories — Dyson does not reach prototype 5,127 without it — but grit on its own is just stubbornness pointed at a wall, and the wall does not always move. The point is narrower than that. It is an invitation to look hard at the part you can actually influence, to put your effort there, and to stop marking yourself down for the things you could neither control nor see coming. The market that was not there, the timing that was wrong, the shock nobody forecast — those were never yours to answer for. What you did next always was.

 

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
Latest News

The WTF, Chocolate?! at Good Grief 

This story was originally published in The Stranger’s July 2026 print issue. Upon perching myself at Good Grief’s bar, my...
- Advertisement -spot_img

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -spot_img